Serving Fine Photos Since 2007

The Worst Kind of Flickr Comments

If you use Flickr, you probably get these kind of comments, wherein someone just copy and pastes some nonce about having seen your photo in some group.  What the hell is that all about?  I get these comments and am like “Good for you!  You saw a photo!”.  I usually delete them and block the person, because if you’re not going to give me at least a real comment, then don’t bother.  I don’t care if/where you saw the photo.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And, while I’m on the subject, I’m not participating in any of your stupid “Award/Comment” things.

Stupid Craigslist Ads

I regularly troll the local (DFW) Craigslist photo page looking for potential bargains to add to my kit.  Unfortunately, I’ve never found anything that seemed like something I’d want to spend my money on.  And that’s probably because almost everything on there is being sold by people that have unrealistic expectations of the valuation of their gear.  I’m sorry, but just because you spent $900 on a Canon Rebel XTi with the kit lens four years ago doesn’t mean that it’s still worth $900.  Anyhow, I thought I’d share a few of the dumber ads that I found today.

  • “Canon Film Camera”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well, that’s nice and generic.  No description or model number or anything…just a demand for you to email them and fork over $250.  I’m sorry, but I can pick up a Canon 35mm camera on eBay for less that $50.  The only way I’d spend more than that on a Canon film camera is if it were a EOS 1, 3 or 1v (which is Canon’s last film camera and currently runs for $1,700, in which case, if you have one, I’ll take if for $250).  But I’m guessing, since you didn’t include any information in your ad, either you’re clueless about photography or are a scammer of some sort.

 

  • Canon EF-S 55-250..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This one is confusing, because in the header, they have the price as $250, but in the body, they’re asking for $300.  But it doesn’t matter…you can buy this lens brand-new for $200.  “But their price includes a hood!” you say.  So what?  That hood is only $25.  Or get a perfectly fine knockoff for less than $5.  So why would I want to pay a premium for a lens that you’ve probably dropped a couple of times and violated in other ways?

 

  • Trade…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So you want me to trade my $1700 lens for your $1400 one? Oh, you’ve had a UV filter on it since you got it…that makes up for my $300 loss…

 

 

Tools of the Trade – FlickStackr

As part of my photoblogging/sharing process, I generally have photos scheduled to be published at 05:30 on my photoblog, where they sit and get viewed and commented upon all day. Then, in the evening, after 19:00 CDT (or 18:00 CST), I upload them to Flickr, giving my site roughly 13-14 hours of exclusivity. The reason for trying to upload to Flickr as close as possible to these times is because that’s when Flickr’s “day” starts (it’s on GMT), which means that uploading at these times is the best way to maximize daily photo views, which are part of the mysterious algorithm Flickr uses to calculate things like “Interestingness” (not that I particularly worry about these things). Also, most people in North America seem to do their Flickr viewing in the evenings, so this time hits a nice spot when my photo will be landing in their “Contacts” photostream.

But how to do the upload? Some people use Flickr’s native upload functionality, but I find this kind of limited. Another option–and one that I occasionally use when uploading from my Mac or my PC–is Flickr Uploadr. Flickr Uploadr has a lot of nice features including the ability to tag photos and put them in sets, but is missing one of the most important–the ability to add a photo to groups from the application, meaning that after you upload, you still have to go into Flickr and add to groups from their interface. Which is okay, but not a favorite task because, for some reason, I constantly get this error when trying to add a photo to groups on the site itself:

(Flickr! Fix your code!)

Another issue with trying to stick to these times is that I’m usually walking our dog, Winston, between 19:00 and 20:00 during these times. Luckily, I have an iPhone with me and can upload on the go. I used to use the Flickr app, but, like the Flickr Uploadr, you can’t add photos to groups. So, after a bit of research, I discovered FlickStackr.

FlickStackr is everything Flickr’s app should be:

  • Profile view

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and

  • Actions/Activity view

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But the most relevant to this blog post is “Upload” and here are screencaps showing how you can set titles, tags, groups, geolocation and more when uploading:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
As you can see, it’s the perfect iOS companion for Flickr users.  And it’s a universal app, so it will work on your iPad at native resolution!

Second Guessing

Sometimes (by which I mean, honestly, “a lot of times”), I second-guess the photo I’ve chosen for a particular day on the photoblog.  I usually post the next day’s photo the night before, queuing up several days if I’m going to be busy or out of town, choosing a photo that I think–at the time–has interesting composition and subject matter and looks great.  But then, sometime the next day or week or even  month–I’ll look at the photo and be like “what the hell was I thinking?”.  Ninety-nine percent of the time I catch my mistaken choice too late, once the photo has been published.  And, since I’m not a fan of rewriting history, I let it stand and make myself promise to do better next time.

Only rarely do I get a chance to fix my mistake before it’s “too late”.  Take last night, for instance.  I’d planned on going out to the roof of our parking garage late so that I could try to get some decent shots of the Moon while it was full and, for the first time in a few days, the skies were clear (or at least what passes for clear in Dallas-Fort Worth).  Knowing that I’d be up late shooting, I decided to go ahead and get a photo posted.  I’d traveled to Fort Worth on Saturday and had wandered around downtown there, taking photos like you do.  I noticed that Tarrant County was in the process of remodeling the clock tower on their courthouse, so I took a few frames from the roof of a parking garage several blocks away, unsure of how usable they’d be backlit against the stormy grey sky.  So, then, last night, I was surprised to find that they had a nice silhouetted effect that brought out the intricate details of the construction scaffolding and proceeded to choose one to process and post.  Unfortunately, in my haste, I chose poorly.  The frame I chose showed the scaffold on the left side and a crane on the right.  At the time, I think my thoughts were that these two subjects–while not traditionally composed–would balance each other out and make for an interesting comparison between the pieces of scaffold and the framework of the crane.  So I posted it.

And went about my business.  I shot the Moon. Came inside, showered off the humidity and downloaded and reviewed my Moon shots.  Then went to bed, reading some of my favorite photo-related sites and forums on my iPad.  Then I started to fall asleep.  And, as I lay there about to succumb to the Sleep Monster, it suddenly occurred to me “I’m about to publish a crap photo”.  So I leaped out of bed to my computer and chose another photo that was basically the same as the one I’d chosen, but used a strong centered composition–something one normally avoids but I think works well in this situaation–that focused on the clock tower scaffolds alone.  Processed and published, I went to bed.

And, now, almost 9 hours later, I’m still happy with my choice.  Here’s the photo I ended up posting on the photoblog:

 

And here’s the misfortunate first choice:

So, did I make the right choice?

The point being, never be afraid to second-guess yourself.  Oftentimes, our first instincts aren’t the right ones, despite what conventional wisdom says.